Wednesday, June 29, 2022

My reflection of...

 My first year of graduate school! It was rough to start graduate school with a broken ankle on a knee scooter. But I also met some amazing people during my first semester and second semester. I have worked on group projects with people that became my closest friends. After my ankle fully healed I thought that meant that I would feel better here and that graduate school would become more fun and easier. I was not correct not even close! 

There are only 2 required classes for my program. The first one I had taken in person with a great professor who knew what she was doing and I have spoken with her since the class has ended. In the second required class, the first red flag for me was that she had never worked in a library let alone studied to become one, and was now teaching us about Library and Society. I mean most of the people in my major have never worked in a library which I don't mind but to stick us with a professor who has never worked in one was bold of the administration, to say the least! The second red flag to me was that she never wanted to teach a class! She admitted that she was forced to teach this class on top of research for her own publications because she was a post-doctoral employee. The third red flag was when we all presented our final group project. My group had picked censorship but we were constantly told to narrow our objective so we did to Public elementary school libraries and how censorships have impacted the collections and the employees working at the libraries. Then when it came to the last group presentation we saw that they had also chosen censorship but just read case studies around the topic. Which somehow made them get a higher score than my group. 

I feel these required classes shouldn't be dependent so heavily on the professors that teach them. There should be a more consistent structure for all professors to follow so we as the students are more likely to learn the same things vs right now where we could be learning about anything from NFTs to Taxonomy or Schemas. I am excited for my second year of graduate school especially now that I will be a TA for two different Gender and Women's studies (GWS) undergraduate classes as well as taking two more graduate-level GWS courses. 

Wednesday, June 1, 2022

Response Paper #2

 Optional Reading: 

From Week 8 Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in LIS and Information Professions 

Hall, T. D. (2007). Race and place: A personal account of unequal access. American Libraries, 38(2), 30-33. https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2020/04/23/race-place-unequal-access/

Additional Readings:

  1. From Week 5 A History of LIS

Brady, H. and Franky, A. (2015, September). A History of US Public Libraries. Digital Public Library of America

 

Over this semester, I wanted to learn more about the diversity or lack thereof within the Library and Information Science industry and the inequality between white and African American populations over history and the present day. When choosing the articles to read and write about for this paper I decided to look for articles that were based on these issues. The articles I chose were from weeks 8 and 5. The first article I chose was the article called Race and place: A personal account of unequal access, by Hall. The second article I chose was the article called A History of US Public Libraries, by Brady and Franky. I will be breaking down these articles with a critical analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the articles as well as relating them back to what we learned in class. 

The first reading, it was a first-hand account of the inequality of access in the rural deep south in the past and present for the year 2007. The author talks about the library where she went to growing up like this, “Anti-theft bars covered every possible point of entry….It was painted a yellowish color that, depending on how the sun hit it, read from pale canary to drab mustard” (Hall, 2007). Her descriptions of the library that she visited weekly as a child painted quite an image for me as the reader. Her description of the library “from the other side of the tracks” as she called it was, “their public library, a gleaming white, a newly blue-carpeted edifice to self-learning” (Hall, 2007). One of the main strengths of this author is her descriptions of the area and the libraries that she visited as a child and the big differences between them. Her writing helps to paint a picture of the past and the present that she is writing about at that time. At the end of the article, she described the renovation of the library that she had visited a lot as a young child after many years of not visiting when in need of the internet, “By the time I made my way to the new iteration of the yellow palace—now relocated, expanded, and situated across the street from a thriving shopping plaza that features the wonder of all wonders, a grocery store—my head was swimming with possibilities. My euphoria was short-lived. Inside the library, the large majority of children and adults gathered around a bank of computer terminals each waiting for their precious hour of allotted time” (Hall, 2007). The one weakness that she has within this article is that she doesn’t reference studies or anything academic about the changes over time but I think that’s why I like it because it reads more like a blog post than a scholarly article or the digital archives I chose to compare it to. I think that this article helps show that over time libraries in the rural deep south have evolved but still have inequalities. 

The second article I chose was the digital archives called A History of US Public Libraries. This article’s authors chose to have a more typical scholarly layout but in an exhibition way. Once you press the “Explore Exhibition” button when you first open the page it shows you the entire exhibition and you can choose on the left-hand side (Brady and Franky, 2015). I chose to go to the “Segregated Libraries” section because that goes into the history of inequalities in public libraries and the African American community (Brady and Franky, 2015). The main strength of this section is that it helps to show the inequalities through pictures and descriptions of the time. The history of the African American community when written by most historians tries to sound objective and like the inequalities, and adversities that they faced are in the past as if they don’t still exist. That is the main weakness of this exhibition because it sounds neutral and objective about these issues. In comparison to the article written by Hall, this exhibition shows more of an overall history vs a personal experience history of inequalities and adversity of the African American community. 

When it comes to this class we talked a lot about neutrality but not as much about the diversity and inequalities that libraries still perpetuate in present-day as well as in the profession's history. Both of these articles represented the Library and Information Science industry just from different perspectives. The first article written by Hall was more of a personal experience of the inequalities and adversity of the African American community and how it is shown through the public library system. This article to me helps show how libraries can not be neutral and ignore the socioeconomic issues that the community and populations of people are facing. The second article written by Brady and Franky showed a more broad picture of the history of libraries and some of it focused on the inequalities and adversity that the African American community has faced within the library system and industry. Overall I liked the first article more because of the personal touch and description of the inequalities and adversity that were faced and are continuing to face by those of lower socioeconomic standing and the African American community in the deep south. 


Response Paper #1

 6. Reference and User Services/6A: Employ techniques used to discover, retrieve, evaluate, and synthesize information from diverse sources for use by varying user populations and information environments. 

9. Technological Knowledge and Skills/9A: Identify appropriate technologies and uses that support access to and delivery of library services and resources.

When it comes to Public Reference Librarians\Librarianship I know more than most people in the class because I have worked as one of a Substitute at the La Grange Public Library. I took IS 501 last semester which is Reference and Information Services through the school. This class is coming in really handy for this response paper because I now have these resources to reference and bring input from in addition to my opinions and first-hand experience in being a Public Reference Librarian. 

I feel that overall this document doesn’t really connect Technology and Reference and User Services together when they are definitely more connected and needed to be seen as such. In the past, while subbing I have helped a Doctoral student from a local University to better understand how to use the databases that he was paying for through his tuition to help with his dissertation. Over the Finals week of last semester, I helped an Undergraduate student that called into the Library to submit his final assignment and found out that Google Slides doesn’t allow for easy ways to record audio over the presentation without a separate application. Both of these interactions might have ended very differently but they still both included the use of technology on their and my part. 

If these interactions had been with let’s say a business person coming in asking for resources to update their technology skills I would have pointed out this resource on the La Grange Public Library website, especially if they are library card holders; Research Page. This page helps lead them to the many different resources that the library pays for with the property tax money that they get every year. One of the examples is “LinkedIn Learning -  (formerly Lynda.com) Video courses taught by industry experts in software, creative, and business skills. (tutorial)” (La Grange Public Library). These resources help not only help those already in a certain industry but those also going through a career pivot. If these resources weren’t listed on the website and not included in the Reference Interview then this patron would be at a loss for this valuable information.

The Reference Interview according to the RUSA Guidelines, this process can happen in any environment including remote chat. So why don’t the Core Competencies relate them together more? I think it is this siloed thinking that helps to keep the industry and subcategories within the industry very separated and not willing to work together. We need to be more willing to collaborate and learn from each other to keep our jobs and the buildings open, especially when it comes to those who don’t want these spaces or buildings to exist. Two examples of this from the Guidelines; “4.2 In-Person; 4.2.1    Accompanies the patron in the search (at least in the initial stages of the search process) unless the patron prefers to conduct the search him/herself.; 4.3 Remote; 4.3.1    Uses appropriate technology to help guide the patron through information resources, when possible.”(ALA).  These guidelines have the same layout where in-person comes before remote. Remote was added because of the increase in its use during the pandemic and more libraries implementing virtual chats for those at higher risk. 

The Almanac could be used online or in print to help keep track of the moon cycle and look up healthy food recipes. When the Almanac was first published it was in print and the Public Libraries would subscribe to it. They would be able to be picked up at the main Circulation or Reference desk in the Libraries. Now that it can be accessed through the computers that can be used by anyone at the Library the size of the text can be increased to help with accessibility issues for those who are visually impaired. A perfect example of this would be this  Rhubarb and Cherry Crisp recipe (Yankee Publishing, Inc). The Public Reference Librarian would\should be able to help this patron figure out how to make the text larger for them to be able to read and then print it off with the printers provided if wanted. 

Overall this response paper helped to show that I feel that the Core Competencies are still separating the Reference and User Services and Technological Knowledge and Skills. These two skills are very important and should be seen as collaborative and helpful to each other. The Public Reference Librarian in me sees these two skills as working together more than separated. I hope in the future I will be able to provide my input and help make changes. 

Bibliography:

  1. ALA. (2020, February 4). Guidelines for the behavioral performance of Reference and Information Service Providers. Reference & User Services Association (RUSA). Retrieved March 10, 2022, from https://www.ala.org/rusa/resources/guidelines/guidelinesbehavioral 

  2. ALA's Committee on Education. (2021). ALA’s Core Competences of Librarianship, Draft 2021. [Core Competencies Policy]. American Library Association. https://www.ala.org/educationcareers/sites/ala.org.educationcareers/files/content/education/Draft%20-%20ALA%20Core%20Competences%202021%20Update.pdf

  3. La Grange Public Library. (n.d.). Research. La Grange Public Library. Retrieved March 10, 2022, from https://www.lagrangelibrary.org/research 

  4. Yankee Publishing, Inc. (n.d.). Almanac.com homepage. Almanac.com. Retrieved March 10, 2022, from https://www.almanac.com/  

Censorship Poster project

This was the final project for one of my classes this semester. My group was great and we came up with this amazing poster! 

Censorship Poster 

My reflection of...

 my mental health. This will be triggering for those that are high-functioning anxious and depressed individuals so just be aware of this.  ...